|
A Voice in the Wilderness There are two pillars on which the stability of any society worthy of the name rests, namely: Loyalty, which obviously involves discriminating in favour of one thing more than another; and Duty, i.e. obligation to fulfil some social responsibility or other . Clearly, loyalty to kith and kin is paramount, since anyone failing on this score is unlikely to be trustworthy in anything else. And this loyalty is only proven where the individual consistently discriminates in favour of kith and kin, however disagreeable this may be to anybody else; which is why the family unit is the keystone of society. Turning to duty, i.e. responsibility, no one can be held accountable for matters over which they have no control/ authority. It follows that there is no so-called ‘human right’ which does not carry its commensurate responsibility; for even a child has responsibilities towards those who fulfil their parental duties. It is therefore quite meaningless to claim human rights in a responsibility vacuum. All of nature and human experience testifies that anything of value has to be paid for in one way or another. This duality of loyalty and discrimination, of rights and responsibilities, is therefore the only honest coinage of private and public morality. Hence anyone seen to be dividing one from the other is a dealer in bogus currency or ‘funny money’. Now the law of the land is supposed to uphold the moral order of society, mainly by privileging the loyal and dutiful citizens and penalising those whose behaviour shows disregard of the dualities outlined above. So what does this tell us about the legislators who actually penalise natural loyalties, notably in the infamous Race Acts, and impose duties without bestowing corresponding rights? There is only one word in the political lexicon which fits such people , and that word is treason , since their actions imperil society while rewarding those as disloyal as themselves and as ready to exercise power without responsibility. Civil disobedience therefore becomes the minimal response, in the form of discrimination - that is to say loyalty to one’s own kind - and rejecting those spurious ‘duties’ which can only be self-destructive. Of course, this will inevitably involve the risk of official harassment; but then the loyalty that costs nothing is worth nothing. Being dutiful to a corrupt Establishment and disloyal to one’s own kind can only result in a totalitarian regime and the collapse of morality. History provides all the evidence needed that when ideologies seek to override natural loyalties and impose artificial ‘duties’, the result is appalling injustices like those notably associated with Communist and religious bigotry. Regrettably, the all-too-numerous ‘sheeple’ will persuade themselves that such governmental excesses couldn’t happen these days in Britain. ‘As soon as this pub closes the revolution starts’ is most people’s experience of radical politics. But what we have instead is an ever more intrusive officialdom; a self-perpetuating Establishment which is stealthily engulfing our civil liberties; a bloated bureaucracy calculated to stifle dissent. In such circumstances any resort to law for protection becomes futile; natural justice disappears when lawyers and the judiciary close ranks in support of a corrupt regime. As for the electoral process, as it stands it affords no genuine opportunity for democratic reform. Complicit mass media and a spurious political pluralism combine to keep the populace in thrall to the same renegade regime, diverted by a theatre of popularity polls and personality cults into a delusion of political choice. Is there a more depressing spectacle than the procession of political zombies through the polling booths while their country is being invaded by alien hordes and their laws issue from unelected bureaucrats in the European Union? But the fact that almost half the population can’t even be bothered to vote these days leads one to hope that more and more people are waking up to the political realities ; to the realisation that choosing between Labour, Conservative and LibDem candidates is a distinction without a difference so far as practical consequences are concerned. With an estimated two thirds of our governance now issuing from the European Union, and the predicted reduction of the native British to minority status in their own country within the next few decades, what exactly is the point of party politics? Seasoned political observers now regard the electoral process as merely another form of soap opera; the plot comprising the same old politically correct sermons and the cast being changed now and then through illness, death or simple boredom. It almost seems as if the will to survive is afflicted by a deadly anaemia in the heartlands of European civilization nowadays. The entire political and cultural establishment seems engaged in apologising to the rest of the world for being so much more advanced in everything that matters. Judging from the tenor of BBC, ITV and other Western broadcasts, events such as Third World genocide , terrorist outrages, race riots, famines, environmental disasters, escalating criminality and all the other afflictions of this world are finally attributable to white racism and imperialism in one form or another. And in this climate we hear our Prime Minister deploring the lack of respect in modern Britain; as it happens sharing that sentiment with the negroid gangsters murdering people in our ‘culturally enriched’ neighbourhoods. Evolution is a history of failed experiments by that cosmic intelligence which drives all possible worlds. In the sonorous lines of O’Shaughnessy: ‘We in the ages lying, in the buried past of the earth, Built Nineveh with our sighing, and Babel itself with our mirth; And o’erthrew them with prophesying to the old of the new world’s worth, For each age is a dream that is dying, or one that is coming to birth. It remains to be seen if Britain as a recognizable entity is in the throes of final dissolution or perhaps on the cusp of a new renaissance. As always, the decisive factor is not in the lap of whatever gods may be; certainly not in the gift of any political faction, much less of foreign agencies. It resides in the hearts and minds of our people, rallying to the greatest of our cultural icons and responding to the impetus of our noblest ancestors. National leadership belongs to those seen to exemplify the best that this country has so far produced, not to the shallow ,self-serving opportunists usurping that role today. If your own life makes a really positive contribution, however small, to your country’s future, you will have earned a place of honour in history; but if not, it were better you never existed at all. And it is later than you think. F Kimbal Johnson November 2006
|