Call Yourself ‘Conservative’?

Your desire to be rid of a disastrous Labour regime is shared by most British people, and ordinarily this would ensure its removal at the next General Election .  But it’s not that simple.  To begin with, a deeply-flawed electoral system shoe-horned Labour into office when, on voting figures alone, that party attracted not more than one in four electors.  Moreover, election analysts agree it will take a much larger switch in voting behaviour than presently indicated to dislodge Labour at the next General Election.   So what hope of real change in our country’s fortunes via the electoral process?

By way of reminder the electorate falls into the following categories:

1. Committed Labour voters

2. Committed Tory voters

3. Committed LibDem  voters 

4. Committed UKIP voters       

5. Committed British Nationalists           

6. Others*

7. Undecided    

* ‘Others’ include a few ‘Greens’ (aka ‘melons’ - green outside but red inside) who will definitely not vote Tory by default.  

There is every reason to expect a much-reduced Labour vote, but how much this alone will secure a Tory victory is open to serious doubt.   As for the Tory turnout, the exodus of traditional supporters is likely to cancel out any influx of new converts.   The disaffected Tories (mostly elderly) will either stay at home or defect to one or other of the minor parties.  Defectors favouring EU membership will go to the LibDems; those opposing it will go to UKIP.   But most of the disaffected Tories feel betrayed by their party not only on the European Union but also on tackling the alien invasion;  which makes them de facto nationalists with no other resort but the BNP or any other nationalist party standing in their constituency.     

Peering ahead, therefore, chances are that, between them, the LibDems, UKIP and the British Nationalists could deprive the Tories of most of their marginal seats at the next general election.  That would of course profit Labour most of all, since a few extra seats at Westminster for LibDems and/or UKIP will have no discernible impact on the overall trend of Westminster politics.   And that trend now represents the greatest threat the people of  Britain have faced in the last thousand years, since support for any of the self-styled ‘centre ground’ parties will make the following consequences quite inevitable:

• The native British become an ethnic minority in their major towns and cities within the next few decades ; thus among other things removing their capacity to elect a patriotic government;

• National sovereignty will be finally dissolved by an unelected EU bureaucracy (which already frames around 60 per cent of our legislation and jurisdiction).

• Terrorism and harassment by aliens increases as they come to dominate local populations.

• Aliens swamp and cripple the social services, NHS, and education system; greatly increase crime statistics and the prison population; hugely inflate house prices and rents; create ever-expanding ghettoes; accelerate ‘white flight’ abroad and out of major towns and cities; erode the green belt; exacerbate road traffic and public transport problems; accelerate cultural decadence; generate gang warfare and race riots; increase taxation; drain pension funds;  intimidate women and the elderly ;    produce urban squalor;  hugely increase family breakdown , mental illness and drug addiction; generate AIDS, TB and VD epidemics; and finally balkanise the country, thus precipitating civil war.  

• Mounting unemployment among the indigenous population will increase family breakdowns while cranking up inter-racial tensions, gang warfare and other criminality. 

• Unable to gain any relief via the electoral process, the indigenous population will then have no alternative but extra-Parliamentary measures; these including whatever it takes to obtain security, social justice, a decent livelihood and reliable public services giving priority to the indigenous population.

• And if you don’t take the above extrapolations seriously you just haven’t been taking notice of events in this country over the last few decades. 

So what’s to be done?

The Fundamentals

Brush aside all the public relations waffle and only support politicians who unequivocally endorse the following fundamentals:

• Preserve the constitutional and territorial integrity of the United Kingdom.

• Restore national sovereignty to make Britain a completely self-governing nation state.

• Restrict British citizenship to people of English, Scottish, Welsh or Ulster ancestry, plus some ‘naturalised’ Europeans.

• Aim for maximum self-sufficiency in defence, energy, food supplies and other essentials. 

• Give the two-parent family priority in taxation, housing, employment and social security.

Those who don’t accept these five fundamentals of national policy thereby define themselves as renegades unworthy of anybody’s respect. Accordingly, their party manifestos are at best irrelevant and at worst treacherous.    

Still nervous of ‘coming out’ as a genuine British nationalist, i.e. patriot? Understandable enough when you’ve been relentlessly conditioned by media propaganda to regard such attitudes as ‘racist and xenophobic bigotry’ instead of honest-to-God patriotism of the kind which made Britain the world’s most attractive country.   So why not find out for yourself that there are no bovver boys and mindless ‘chavs’ in the core membership of established nationalist parties operating within the law?  With most you’ll find common accord within minutes.  Those few alleged to have criminal records were actually sent to prison just for saying what most people are really thinking about the alien invasion. But above all these people have the courage of their convictions, unlike the muttering classes who cling to their pseudo-respectability for fear of official displeasure, peer-group ostracism, career damage, harassment by media hacks and Rentamob or worse.   It’s actually getting safer all the time out here on the right wing; and anyway, the loyalty that costs nothing is worth nothing.  The undeclared patriots would have you believe their civilized reserve simply reflects abhorrence of anything which smacks of ‘right wing extremism’ (cue media clips of Nazi stormtroopers, emaciated ‘Holocaust’ victims, massed violins, etc.,etc.).

When pressed, it emerges that - though genuflecting to Enoch Powell in private  - they haven’t actually met any alleged ‘right wing extremists’ or read any of their literature; nor can they quote one item in the nationalist manifesto.  Their impression is based instead on ludicrous stereotypes and politically correct parables in TV and radio programmes which sedulously exclude any dissident views.   ‘Oh not at all’ they sometimes object, claiming instead a sturdy Churchillian, that is to say ‘anti-Nazi’ political stance.   Would that be the same Churchill who said ‘How few men are strong enough to stand against the prevailing currents of opinion?  Be prepared to stand up faithfully for Right and Truth, however the wind may blow’    

So go on then….conserve something.  

F Kimbal Johnson

December 2006   

Back to Articles            Back to News