|
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT Mass media reporting and political debates about any inter-racial strife in our towns and cities invariably conform to the politically-correct agenda, whereby white racism and inadequate spending on alien-occupied areas are depicted as the only villains. Considerable air time is given to people accusing British nationalists of deliberately fomenting inter-racial strife in the areas affected, without a shred of hard evidence to support such allegations. So the run-up to future elections in these areas will certainly see an intensive media and leafleting campaign designed to intimidate patriotic voters with a mixture of bribes, threats and downright lies. Attack is the best defence tactic for nationalist campaigners, who should therefore seek to ‘immunize’ the electorate against such poisonous propaganda well in advance of elections. Our leaflets should on one side identify the main items of renegade propaganda, and on the other state the nationalist manifesto as succinctly as possible. The ‘antidote’ side of the leaflet should, for example, state quite baldly that the British nationalist movement
On the manifesto side of the leaflet we should state our commitment to:
A leaflet doesn’t have to do more than this to separate patriots from renegades anywhere in the country; since our opponents cannot attack these commitments without thereby exposing their own disloyalty to the British people. In short, the nationalist manifesto is not up for discussion by anybody, so don’t waste valuable time on people who try to question it. And never waste time trying to extricate yourself from ‘extremist’ and ‘racist’ allegations by media people or political opponents. Instead, let the nationalist campaign leaflet speak for itself and challenge its critics to declare their alternative policies. Make this the cutting edge of nationalist campaigning. F Kimbal Johnson May 2007 |