|
MIND YOUR LANGUAGE Introduction It is an axiom of economic warfare that the surest way of destroying a country is to debase its currency ; for example, by flooding the markets with counterfeit money . It is no less true that the surest way of destroying a nation’s cohesion, culture and identity is to counterfeit its language. Not surprisingly, therefore, the subversive agencies within Britain today are giving top priority to corruption of the English language. These ‘semantic forgers’, all in the course of promoting their odious political correctness, are busily at work in our schools and colleges, in central and local government, in publishing houses and throughout the mass media. In the process they are seeking to make certain words as unacceptable as counterfeit money, to alter the traditional meaning and value of other words, and to introduce new terms serving their own perverse ideology . (George Orwell prophesied as much in his novel ‘1984’, where ‘Newspeak’ was the official language). The process is insidious and potentially deadly; accordingly we must exercise the utmost vigilance and ruthlessness in arresting its progress, just as we would have to remove all counterfeit money from circulation in order to safeguard the value of our material assets . And let no one dismiss the matter as ‘just words’. Words are the vehicles of thought, and thought governs most of our lives in one way or another. As with counterfeit money or goods, we must be alert enough to detect the attempted fraud at - and preferably before - the point of sale, or else we soon find ourselves a good deal poorer . Accordingly, the aim of these notes ( and of the associated ‘Nationalist Vocabulary’) is to sharpen this vigilance and help drive the counterfeiters and all their worthless productions out of our national life . But first we need to review the ways in which people’s thoughts, speech and behaviour are influenced by propaganda ; a term denoting all attempts to prescribe and control what people think on given subjects . In an ideal world, education would teach people how to think for themselves and thus avoid falling prey to propagandists. Unhappily, however, what passes for ‘education’ in our schools and colleges today is all too often heavily contaminated with propaganda of one kind or another ; thus promoting officially-approved bigotry on certain subjects, and producing the kind of person ‘most ignorant of what he’s most assured’ . Which has made ‘unlearning’ a very necessary part of education for life in the real world. It is hoped the following notes will be helpful in that direction. Elements of Propaganda Word approval - whereby certain words or phrases are given special prominence and ‘respectability’ by their frequent usage in influential circles and the mass media. People are thus apt to adopt such usages themselves on the grounds that ‘what’s good enough for the likes of them must be alright’. One need only observe the influence of popular media figures in promoting everyday use of certain words or catchphrases. Note also how certain profanities once wholly unacceptable in polite company have now become commonplace in the mass media and, as a result, in everyday social intercourse. Word disapproval - whereby certain words or phrases expose the user to disagreeable social reactions like personal abuse , loss of preferment and even of employment, and other forms of victimisation . The offender is put under more or less punishing pressure to ‘mind your language’ and conform ; as witness the rampant ‘political correctness‘ lobbies in education, publishing, the mass media and politics . Such pressures now begin at kindergarten level . Repetition - given enough repetition the ‘in’ word or phrase will soon replace its predecessors, if only because people don’t like to sound ‘odd’ or behind the times . Euphemism - disguising whatever is intrinsically ugly, repulsive, disgraceful or otherwise unacceptable behind less offensive or neutral labels . At the everyday level this is just a matter of simple politeness, good taste and civilised conduct ; but in the hands of unscrupulous politicians and lobbyists the euphemism becomes a sinister device to deceive and indoctrinate people into accepting things which are contrary to their best interests. Typical examples are ‘gay’ for sex pervert ; ‘love-making’ or ‘sleeping with' for casual copulation ; ‘multi-cultural’ for mongrelised ; ‘under-privileged’ for parasite ; ‘entrepreneur ‘ for swindler ; ‘negotiated settlement’ for surrender ; ‘subsidiarity’ for subordination ; ‘freedom’ for anarchy ; ‘non-judgemental’ for indiscriminate ; ‘value-free’ for unprincipled . (See other examples in ‘The Nationalist Vocabulary’) . Censorship - may of course go well beyond mere word or phrase disapproval to suppression of certain kinds of publication and of certain writers or speakers by officialdom, academics and the media . Some forms of censorship are of course benign ; for example when applied to pornography, national security and libelous material. The question to ask in each case is whose interests are being protected by the censor. Popular appeal - whereby the propagandist’s message is ‘packaged’ or presented in a way likely to disarm criticism . This is designed to exploit the ‘feel-good factor’ among the all-too-gullible general public, using popular entertainers and radio/TV soap-operas as vehicles for multi-racism, feminism, homosexuality, promiscuity, Euro-federalism, etc.. For example, negroes and Asians are featured in numerous programmes as if they were a normal part of British society . They are usually depicted as highly intelligent, responsible, exemplary and ‘caring’ people, whose presence enriches our society . In popular radio and TV series they are almost invariably cast as model citizens, heroes, or victims of white ‘racism’ , by programme-makers aptly described as ‘inverted missionaries’. And if the plot will not sustain too many alien ‘parachutists’, they are gratuitously inserted into any available ‘background spaces ( a process known among media cameramen as ‘blonking’ , i.e. getting Blacks ‘on camera’) . The popular appeal element of such propaganda is therefore an artful compound of bogus philanthropy, promiscuity and euphemism . all designed to ‘help the medicine go down’ all those gullible throats. But , in particular, the ‘multi-cultural’ campaign amounts to the same thing as claiming that adding dirty water to vintage wine produces an exciting new cocktail . Countering Propaganda It would be impracticable and imprudent to detail here the precise countermeasures we should employ to remove or antidote this poisoning of our national culture . Since we are denied access to the mass media and major publishing facilities, are subject to legal harassment at every turn, and have meagre resources, direct assault on the ‘dark satanic mills’ of anti-British propaganda is out of the question at this time. There remain, however, a variety of tactics designed to outflank censorship and counter the propagandists of racial, cultural and national subversion. For example: Maximum use of Internet websites to expose malign propaganda and promote patriotism, cultural and moral integrity. Production and distribution of leaflets, pamphlets, books, posters, stickers, video/audio-tapes, etc., all promoting the cause of racial nationalism. Education and training of local nationalists to include a) Providing them with a vocabulary list to be thoroughly learned. b) lists of required reading c) interview, canvassing and debating skills (perhaps using audio-visual play-backs to assess performance and identify good and bad points) Thus, like some evangelical movements, we can train our ‘missionaries’ to get the right messages across to the right people in the right way at all times. We can thereby ensure that all our representatives are respected and potent advocates on the election platform, on the doorstep, in the studio, lecture-room, school, canteen, workplace, pub or club. Members should achieve seniority on the basis of their personal command of the nationalist ‘gospel’, on their achievements in terms of literature sales, leafleting and recruitment. It also goes without saying that all of our representatives must be exemplary in their general appearance, bearing and conduct before the public. They should also challenge every example of propagandist language they encounter in everyday life, and take special care to educate their children and other relatives and friends in the ‘free speech’ of racial nationalism. In conclusion, we cannot afford to be less dedicated and effective than our nation’s enemies. Given half a chance, we win all the important arguments; which is precisely why the corrupt Establishment and mass media are so desperate t o keep us out of the public domain. So every one of our members must be at least as potent as any evangelist in opening people’s minds to the timeless truths about race and nationhood. Racial nationalism is the language of our most illustrious ancestors and the best possible legacy for our own offspring. So let us make it heard and spoken everywhere among our own people. Words are the weapons of this war; so let us all become word-perfect in the cause of British nationalism. F Kimbal Johnson January 2009
|