All  sporting  and  athletic  events ,  from  the  school  playing  field  and  local  gymnasium  to  the  Olympics  stadium ,  are  occasions  when  the  participants  are  supposed  to  be  representing  a  particular  organization (e.g. school , company,  regiment) or  some  geographically  or  politically-defined  part  of  the  world .  Supporters  are  therefore  supposed  to  identify  ( a  very  significant  word !)  with  individual  athletes  or  teams ,seeing  the  triumphs  of   ‘their’  team  or  athlete  as   a  boost  to  their  own  self-esteem  as  members  of  the  same  community .

But  what  exactly  are  authentically  British  people  supposed  to  be  applauding when  a   negro  athlete  or  multi-racial  team  wins  the  event  under  British  colours ? Is  it  a  genuinely   ‘British’  achievement ,  an  individual  negro’s  triumph,  or  just  another form of multi- racialist politics ?  It  happens that the physical characteristics of certain races give them a distinct  advantage in many athletic contests and ball-games .  For example,  the musculo-skeletal structure of many negroids makes  them  ‘naturals’  for track  athletics (although it  becomes a handicap in competitive swimming ).

Generally  therefore, there  will  always  be  more  negroids  than  caucasians  with  the ideal  physical  attributes  for certain  types  of  sport  or  athletics .  Likewise  the negroid  skull  is thicker  than  the  caucasoid for boxing  contests, whereas  the negroid  brain  consistently under- performs in comparison with caucasoid  and  mongoloid peoples..   All  of  this  is  both  scientifically  established  and  historically self- evident.

It is only to be expected  that negroids exploit  their  physical advantages in caucasian  societies where they are intellectually and therefore socially  disadvantaged . And  while  they  are  never going to distinguish themselves in  terms of intellectual capacity , innovative genius or scholarly achievement , they will continue to excel  in  those  fields  to  which  their  physical  characteristics are  ideally  suited .    Thus, while  the sporting  and  athletic  records  and  journals  are  crowded  with   successful  negroes,  they  remain  virtual  non-entities in  the context of  European culture.    There  is nothing  at  all  ‘racist’  about  such  differences;  they are as uncontentious as the fact that  famous  poets and  scientists tend not to be champion  pugilists or shot-putters,  and vice versa .

So while applauding the physical performance of individual negroes, it cannot be claimed that they represent anybody but themselves and their racial kin..  After all, if  Beethoven or  Shakespeare or  Darwin had held Ugandan  passports ,  would  they  be lauded  as  exemplars  of  African culture ? .  Thus multi-racial  football  teams can represent  only  themselves.    The  coloured athlete or team  member is no  more  than a  mercenary  when participating in any  allegedly  ‘British’  event .   And  no  one would  seriously suggest  that an army  heavily reliant  on  foreign  mercenaries could  win glories for  the  host  population.   Yet still  the inane sports and  games commentators go blathering on about  ‘another gold for Britain’ when  a  negro scores ;  when  the  truth  is  that  the  nation’s stature is not enhanced  but diminished thereby.

So call  the sports or athletics  team what  you may,  if  it includes aliens it no longer qualifies as ‘British’ in any meaningful sense .  So when you hear the cheer go up for  an  allegedly  ‘British’ success,  ask yourself  what is being applauded other than an individual’s prowess. One therefore despairs of people who cheer multi-racial teams ostensibly representing any part of Britain...

They remind us of Enoch Powell’s quotation that ‘Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad’