Topical Report By Merlin Jim

‘Downing Street’ said on Monday (30th January) that there is to be no exemption for any religious organisation to homosexual adoption. Now, if anyone reading this tends to be a little bit sensitive I don’t intend to 'mince' (excuse the pun!) any words although I shall try to keep within the law on homophobia.

The Catholic Church have declared that they want an exemption on religious grounds, so let’s examine what this could possibly mean. The first thing you have to consider is that in the bible there are two unredeemed sins; one of them is homosexuality and quite ironically the second is the harming of children, so I would think that within the realms of their religion it would be quite honest and entitled to object to putting children up for adoption with homosexuals this would be their right and the right of anyone who thought about homosexuals in biblical terms.

Should we first make it clear what Downing Street says means.  Now, before it was barred off and gated, Downing Street was open for the public to walk down and I walked down there several times in my younger days and at no time did I ever hear the actual street, or the building at number ten uttering a word! So, what “Number Ten says” or "What Downing Street says” actually refers to the word passed down by the auto-omnipotentially deluded, totalitarian dictators the Blairs.  I would accept that in a democracy even the Blairs are entitled to voice their opinion, but in view of this I counted them to see just how many of them there were and I’m afraid I didn’t get up to any more than two!

Now, there are a lot more of us out here who are also equally entitled to our own point of view, and in this respect on such a fundamental issue to do with the health, safety and welfare of our future generations including adoptive children we SHOULD have had a referendum on the issue, quite positively; and I would repeat that, and repeat it, and repeat it until I was sick of hearing it myself. 

On Tuesday (31st January) it became apparent that Cardinal O’Connor appears to have chickened out slightly from his original words; whether he has had to bow to pressure or not I do not know, but he now says that he has no argument with homosexuals, but he just thinks that children should be adopted by people of normal, heterosexual mother/father relationships.

Well, I would have to remind him and the Blairs just what we are talking about when it comes to putting children for adoption with homosexuals. As I’ve previously warned, do not read any further if you do not wish to be slightly shocked. Let’s have an imaginary situation where a ten year old boy is adopted by two homosexual males, and it transpires that one evening he maybe needs a drink of water, or he’s had a bad dream, so he pops into their bedroom and sees them in the very act of buggery.  He stops short for a moment and then says “Daddy one, why are you doing that to daddy two? You will get poo all over your willy.”  Although this is an imaginary scenario, it bluntly displays that sodomists are in no moral position to bring up children.  If they adopt say boys, when they get to the age of 16 they will not be blood relatives and therefore in law they will be open to abuse; and I make no apology for saying that, they WILL be open to abuse. Although I can not guarantee whether or not this will actually occur, it is a balance that should certainly be taken into consideration, therefore deeming the whole idea of placing children under the ’care’ of homosexuals as totally out of the question.

Here I to return to my old corny saying that we in this so called parliamentary democracy of ours elect our members of parliament not to rule us but to govern us, to govern us according to OUR wishes, and I, as I have said many times before, I would accept a referendum on this issue. If the referendum went against me then I would accept it; I would always accept the outcome of a referendum against my own personal feelings if I thought that is what the majority of people in the country wanted,  because this to me  is what democracy is; NOT the dictatorship of just a chosen few loony lefties at the top who, if I can pinch the words of Dwight David Eisenhover, The Prime Minister of this country [Britain] has the ability to rule like a dictator with just a few extra votes off his constituents and is not subject to selection by the mass of the British people. And as the situation at the moment has it the Government per se  is ruling with a very, very small electoral total which apparently is the lowest since about 1906 and you could say this does not have a major mandate from the British people to govern or dictate such things that offend against public decency and dignity and against the will of the people of this country.

So, why are we not given referendums? Other countries have them in abundance, particularly Switzerland. I shall tell you why - it is because our ‘mighty leaders’ deem the general public of this country too ignorant, stupid and  brainless to be trusted with one! The only apology for a referendum we ever had was one that was rigged and produced and answer that was determined by the question in any case.

Anyway, I digress! Returning to our discussion on putting children in the care of  people who are the direct link to the most devastating pandemic the world has ever seen known and many of whom carry the virus which could quite easily be passed on the children who are supposedly in their ‘care’.

If we take it back to the biblical concept the fact is that homosexuality in male terms is dirty, degrading, demoralising and is an offence against the person and against God. If you happen to be a believer, as Cardinal Cormack should be then it is also as I have just said, the direct link to aids and this should be considered as much as any other reason for NOT putting children in their care.

As my good wife the NA’s Genie says, “If nature intended puffs to have children then they would be able to. The mere fact that they can not means that they SHOULD NOT.  Nobody is considering the feelings of all those innocent children and the irreparable harm it could do to them.  Once again, welfare, decency and morality are cast aside for political correctness.”

What I personally would like to hear or see now is every public organisation in this country that has any objection to this idea of putting adoptive children with homosexuals to raise their voices now and  demand a referendum on the subject, not sometime in the future but this very instant, before the legislation is enacted.  We have a right to say what happens to our children and this should NOT be determined by a handful of loony lefties. 

Stand up and be counted... NOW

03.02.07